Posts Tagged ‘ Oregon Environmental Council ’

Panelists Chosen For Governor’s Debate On The Environment

March 11, 2010
By

Things are coming together for the debate later this month that will focus on environmental issues in the race for Governor.

David Sarasohn of the Oregonian will be moderator. Four panelists will be asking the questions.

Read more »

Session Watch: Greenhouse Gas Bill Goes To Governor

February 24, 2010
By

UPDATE: Our initial vote tally was incorrect. It’s been updated.

In the last days of the special session, one more victory notch in the belt of Oregon’s environmental community.

This afternoon, the House approved SB 1059, a bill that lowers greenhouse gas emissions from car and light trucks. The Oregon Environmental Council says the vote was 32-26. The Senate approved the bill yesterday, all that’s left is getting the Governor’s signature.

Here’s a brief rundown of what’s in the bill:

Read more »

Session Watch: Senate Approves Greenhouse Gas Bill

February 23, 2010
By

Update:

1000 Friends of Oregon and the Oregon Environmental Council released a joint statement praising the bill.

Mary Kyle McCurdy, 1000 Friends of Oregon Policy Director says, “This victory will help create healthier, sustainable communities across Oregon. And it’s a major step for giving Oregonians better transportation choices.”

“SB 1059 is a win-win for cities and towns across Oregon,” says Chris Hagerbaumer, Deputy Director of the Oregon Environmental Council. “The bill will help create the tools and resources local governments need to make cost effective decisions on planning future growth while also improving air quality and reducing harmful greenhouse gas emissions. Cities and towns of all sizes will be able to use the tools that the agencies develop.”

Read more »

Session Watch: BPA Ban Moves To Senate Floor

February 11, 2010
By

Proving the green agenda is far from dead in Salem, the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee voted 3-2 this afternoon to protect young children from bisphenol A (BPA).

SB 1032 will ban the sale and manufacture of baby bottles and cups that contain BPA. It’s been dubbed the “baby bottle and sippy cups” bill.

The bill moves to the Senate floor. Jeremy Graybill of the Oregon Environmental Council says a vote could come early next week.

While still a victory, the bill has been weakened some since it was introduced.

Read more »

Session Watch Thursday: BPA Safety and Offshore Drilling Ban

February 3, 2010
By

Thursday’s green agenda in Salem includes the first hearing on a proposed bisphenol A (BPA) ban, and a possible vote on a bill to ban offshore oil and gas drilling near the Oregon coast.

Read more »

Bill Will Protect Oregon Children From Exposure To BPA

January 22, 2010
By

Oregon’s lawmakers will consider a bill to protect young children from being exposed to bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical found in many hard plastic bottles and metal food and beverage cans.

Senate Bill 1032 aims to do this in two ways. First, it bans the sale and manufacture of BPA lined containers, if they’re designed primarily for use by children under three years old. It also bans the sale of food and liquid to children under the age of three, if it’s been stored in a BPA lined container.

Read more »

Developing: More Gore Protests Planned For Today In Portland

November 18, 2009
By

At least two more groups are calling for protests outside Keller Auditorium, the stage for tonight’s public lecture by former Vice President Al Gore.

Joining the anti-Gore protests will be Americans For Prosperity, a group that opposes cap-and-trade legislation. In their view, it’s an unaffordable tax on energy. The group’s President Tim Phillips will be speaking at the Keller Fountain about 5:30pm.

That’s in addition to the protest already planned by MoveOnDotGore. This group will gather outside Keller about the same time and their agenda appears very similar to Americans For Prosperity, against cap-and-trade and doubters on climate change.

Plus, according to Willamette Week, PETA plans a third protest. They want Gore to stop eating meat and prove his “green” credentials.

The Oregonian reports this morning that someone vandalized Keller Auditorium with anti-Gore graffiti.

Meanwhile environmental groups are rallying supporters to put on a counter demonstration. Repower America, Climate Solutions and Oregon Environmental Council are all spreading the word to gather outside Keller starting about 5:30pm. Get more information here.

So, PETA is promising a “nearly” naked Mother Earth, and MoveOnDotGore is asking people to show up in polar bear costumes. Could be quite show. The best seats for tonight may be outside of Keller.

But on a serious note, no matter how you feel about Gore, climate change and cap-and-trade, this is an excellent opportunity to show up and be heard. With the United Nations Climate Change conference starting in less than three weeks, this issue will dominate the headlines for some time to come.

Green Groups Unhappy With Transportation Bill, Call For Changes

May 22, 2009
By

Not that long ago, Oregon’s top environmental groups were optimistic, almost excited, about getting more money for mass transit, biking and walkable neighborhoods. They put their hopes in House Bill 2001, the giant transportation bill that will guide spending over the next two years.

My how things have changed.

Late this week, those same groups say the bill has morphed into a money for roads bill that leaves little to spend on other forms of transportation. “What started as a balanced transportation package has become an $840 million highway funding bill that takes the state backward,” says Bob Stacey, with 1000 Friends of Oregon. “We can’t support the package in its current form.”

HB 2001 includes a list of 50 road building or road widening projects for Oregon.  But only 37 of them are funded in the bill.  The money would come from increased gas taxes and vehicle fees.

In a letter to Governor Kulongoski, the groups are calling for three major changes.

  • Require plans for cutting global warming pollution from cars and trucks in the fastest growing areas of the state.  Right now, the bill only includes the Portland metro area.
  • Increase spending on bicycle and pedestrian projects to a minimum of 1.5% of what’s spent for roads.  Or create a new funding source for these kinds projects.
  • Have the Transportation Commission review the road projects in the bill and decide if they really are the best way to spend the money.  The current list has been criticized as pork because many of the projects have been submitted by individual lawmakers.

The letter was signed by 1000 Friends of Oregon, Oregon Environmental Council, Environment Oregon, the Bicycle Transportation Alliance, and the Oregon League of Conservation Voters.

For an interesting perspective on the issue, see this posting by former senatorial candidate Steve Novick on Blue Oregon.

The Special Joint Committee On Transportation held a hearing on HB 2001 Thursday night, and continues work on the bill starting at 1pm in Hearing Room F. If you can’t be there in person you can follow along via streaming video on the Oregon Channel website.

Climate Change Bill Approved By Oregon House

May 8, 2009
By

The first major piece of climate change legislation passed the Oregon House today on a narrow, 32-28 vote.

House Bill 2186 takes a number of steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including…

  • Requires tire companies to start selling “low rolling resistance” tires that improve gas mileage and reduce pollution.  Supporters say tires cost about $7 – $12 more per set, but can save drivers anywhere from $50 – $150 in lower fuel costs.
  • Allows Oregon DEQ to require long haul truckers to improve the aerodynamics of their rigs, giving them better fuel efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.  The Oregon League Of Conservation Voters says this could save truckers billions of dollars in annual fuel costs.
  • Restricts unneeded idling for heavy trucks and ships at ports.  Allows the DEQ to set exemptions.
  • Introduces a low carbon fuel standard.  Fuel suppliers will have to reduce the greenhouse emissions of the fuel they sell in Oregon10% by 2020.  Gives suppliers some flexibility in how they meet the standards.

Environmental groups were quick to praise the legislation.  Evan Manvel with the Oregon League of Conservation Voters calls HB 2186 a “no-brainer”, because it focuses on simple changes he says, “Will help pave the way to a green economy that will create local jobs and save precious dollars for Oregon’s working families.”

Other major supporters include the Healthy Climate Partnership and the Oregon Environmental Council.

But Oregonians for Food and Shelter, which represents agriculture interests, has criticized the bill saying it gives DEQ “loose reins” to bring Oregon in line with California’s greenhouse gas regulations.  The group says retrofitting trucks for better aerodynamics will cost $5,000 – $15,000 per rig and will cost drivers far more than what it will save them in fuel efficiency.

Global Warming Hearing: Part One

April 9, 2009
By

We’re watching today’s hearing on Senate Bill 80, legislation that will put Oregon on a path to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the state.

The bill tells agencies and industry to develop plans that will meet goals of reducing emissions at least 10% below 1990 levels by the year 2020, and at least 75% below 1990 levels by 2050.

Part of the discussion includes an ongoing argument over whether mandating these goals is a “hard cap” (a term used by opponents) or something else.

Here’s what witnesses are telling the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee.

Andrea Durbin, Oregon Environmental Council, Supporter:

  • She says the greenhouse gas reduction goals established by the 2007 Legislature are a good first step but, “We’re not going to see action in Oregon until we have a process for moving forward.” She believes the bill will make sure Oregon industry will be more competitive in a “carbon restrained world.”

Dave Robertson, Portland General Electric, Opponent:

  • He says the bill will force PGE to close some power plants and build new ones, costing consumers $7 billion. Robertson says that could nearly double power bills by 2020. “A hard cap,” says Robertson, “is something we simply can’t accept.”

Tim Miller, Green Lite Motors, Supporter:

  • Miller’s company is a start up that builds electric vehicles. He says EVs will help Oregon meet these reduction goals, noting that the state already has some EV manufacturers and other big companies such as Nissan and Think may build factories here, “The demand is here and the products are coming.”

Jennifer Hudson, Ash Grove Cement, Opponent:

  • She says Ash Grove is the only cement manufacturer in Oregon. Located in Baker County, the plant employees more than 100 people and provides about 20% of the county’s tax base. She says if Oregon moves forward alone on global warming, it will put her plant and the state’s economy at a disadvantage. She says the state should wait for Congress to create a national plan.

To leave comments, please click on the “Continue reading” link.

Read more »