Posts Tagged ‘ ken salazar ’

Breaking: Sage Grouse Won’t Be Listed – At Least Not For Now

March 5, 2010
By

A Greater Sage Grouse near Burns, Oregon. Photo from BLM.

Faced with a difficult decision about protecting – or not protecting – the Greater sage-grouse, Interior says it’s going to split the difference.

Secretary Ken Salazar announced Friday morning that the sage-grouse deserves to be listed by the Endangered Species Act, but that’s not going to happen anytime soon. The official label is that listing is “warranted, but precluded.”

So it becomes a candidate species. The bird’s status will be reviewed yearly. But Interior says it can’t protect every species that deserves it, and it has to set priorities. The sage-grouse falls into the bottom third of the candidate list.

Read more »

Interior Releases New Logging Plan For Western Oregon

October 14, 2009
By

Interior Secretary Salazar is stepping into the middle of one of the Northwest’s longest running environmental battles, logging the vast federal forests of Western Oregon.

Old growth forest on BLM land at Esmond Lake.  Photo by Kristian Skybak.  For more see flickr.com/kristiansven.

Old growth forest on BLM land at Esmond Lake. Photo by Kristian Skybak. For more see flickr.com/kristiansven.

The challenge is this: how do you create a steady supply of timber for local economies without hurting those forests and the endangered species that live there?  The two previous administrations have tried, and failed, to come up with logging plans that could win widespread support. Clinton’s Northwest Forest Plan was bitterly opposed by the timber industry. Bush’s WOPR was so badly flawed that the Obama administration decided it would be a waste of time to defend it in court.

Which brings us to today’s announcement.

First, Salazar says he’s moving forward with a one year plan to allow the logging of some 230 million board feet during 2010.  He’s approved 46 timber sales and another 16 are still under consideration.  Most of the sales involve thinning and restoration projects, the kind that are less likely to be controversial.

That’s not much of a change from what’s been happening the past few years.  From 2005 to 2008, the Bureau of Land Management says it’s offered an average of 206 million board feet for logging each year.  But the actual amount that was harvested is much less, about 150 million board feet.

So far, so good.

But the bigger challenge is coming up with a long term strategy for managing the 2.4 million acres of BLM forests in Western Oregon.

Salazar has ordered the BLM and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to work together on finding long term solutions.  The two agencies will form a special task force that will report back to him by next spring.  Getting these two agencies to cooperate is extremely important.  Because while BLM has authority over the forests, Fish and Wildlife as well as other agencies, have a legal duty to protect the endangered species.  Lack of cooperation is one of the big reasons the Bush WOPR logging plan was killed.

One sign that Salazar might be on the right track is that Senator Wyden and Congressman DeFazio attended today’s announcement and offered their support.  Wyden called the plan, “good old fashioned common sense”, saying that bringing all the agencies together now the plan will save time and lead to healthier forests.

The reaction from the environmental community is not as enthusiastic.  Oregon Wild has been following the logging dispute closely.  Steve Pedery, the group’s Conservation Director, says “Increased cooperation between the BLM and Fish and Wildlife is a good start, but the bottom line is that the BLM must begin to place as much value on wild salmon, clean water and old-growth forests as they do on logging volume.”

Oregon Wild is also concerned because the Salazar plan for next year includes clear cut logging on about 1,000 acres of BLM land.  ”The public rejected clear-cutting decades ago,” says Pedery.  ”If the Obama administration wants to avoid conflict and controversy, they should rein-in BLM clear-cutting.”

Klamath Basin Agreement “Within Reach”

July 1, 2009
By

Here’s a tantalizing headline from the Interior Department.

Secretary Ken Salazar says a final agreement to manage water in the Klamath River Basin, and to remove hydropower dams from the river, is “within reach”. All we need, according to Salazar, is “one more push” and the agreement could be finalized by the end of summer.

Along with today’s bold prediction, comes an announcement that the deadline to reach that agreement was extended from June 30 to September.

Copco 2 dam.  Photo Courtesy State of California

Copco 2 dam. Photo Courtesy State of California

If Salazar is right, this could bring to a close one of the ugliest fights over water in the west. Removing the four hydropower dams would be the largest dam breaching project in U.S. history, and the Klamath River could regain its position as one of the mighty salmon producing rivers along the Pacific.

But considering how long it’s taken to get to this point, you can’t blame environment groups for feeling skeptical. Oregon Wild posted a statement about the missed June 30th deadline with concerns that talks could drag on for years. The posting was made before today’s announcement.

But the group’s Conservation Director Steve Pedrey seemed to have a premonition of it when he said, “If I had a dollar for every time I’ve heard backers of this deal say that a final agreement is ‘right around the corner,’ I’d have enough money to pay for dam removal myself.”

Oregon Wild has been critical of the overall agreement, saying it guarantees water supply for agriculture, but has no guarantees for salmon. It also says the deal will hurt the Lower Klamath Lake and Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuges by giving agriculture the right to farm on 22,000 acres of refuge land for 50 years. During dry years, the farmers will have first rights to the water, and there may not be enough left over for the thousands of birds and other wildlife who call these areas home.

Another piece of the agreement is that Pacific Power, which owns the four hydropower dams, doesn’t want to have to pay for their removal. The costs will be passed on to residents of Oregon and California. In our state, the legislature recently agreed to increase electricty bills for Pacific Power customers by 2% to help pay for dam removal.