<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Natural Oregon &#187; Birding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.naturaloregon.org/category/recreation/birding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.naturaloregon.org</link>
	<description>Environmental News for Oregon and the Pacific Northwest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 02:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Endangered Shorebird May Be Rebounding In Oregon</title>
		<link>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/11/12/endangered-shore-bird-may-be-rebounding-in-oregon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/11/12/endangered-shore-bird-may-be-rebounding-in-oregon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endangered Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odfw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon department of fish and wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowy plover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturaloregon.org/?p=2235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some encouraging news to pass along this afternoon. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife says the Western Snowy Plover had a very good summer along the Oregon Coast. In some ways, it was the best summer since monitoring began in 1990. Back then, wildlife officials found only 50 adult plovers along the shore. This past summer, they counted at least 201. The bird is listed as a threatened species under federal and Oregon law. A long time ago, Western Snowy Plovers were numerous and widespread. But much of their habitat has been ruined by development and an invasive European beach grass. Since the birds like to nest in sandy beach areas, it&#8217;s easy for people to disturb them. If you&#8217;ve ever seen sections of the beach cordoned off with signs and flags, that&#8217;s done to protect snowy plover nests. ODFW says beach visitors do a good job of respecting the signs, and it&#8217;s one of the reasons why the numbers of snowy plovers are rebounding. “This year’s data is really encouraging. It appears that the work we’ve been doing with habitat and predator management is helping,” says Dave Lauten, wildlife biologist with Oregon State University. “A lot of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2236" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 295px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2236" title="snowy plover male and chick odfw web" src="http://www.naturaloregon.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/snowy-plover-male-and-chick-odfw-web.jpg" alt="Western Snowy Plover adult male and chick. Photo from ODFW." width="285" height="291" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Western Snowy Plover adult male and chick. Photo from ODFW.</p></div>
<p>Some encouraging news to pass along this afternoon. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife says the Western Snowy Plover had a very good summer along the Oregon Coast. In some ways, it was the best summer since monitoring began in 1990.</p>
<p>Back then, wildlife officials found only 50 adult plovers along the shore. This past summer, they counted at least 201.</p>
<p>The bird is listed as a threatened species under federal and Oregon law. A long time ago, Western Snowy Plovers were numerous and widespread. But much of their habitat has been ruined by development and an invasive European beach grass.</p>
<p>Since the birds like to nest in sandy beach areas, it&#8217;s easy for people to disturb them. If you&#8217;ve ever seen sections of the beach cordoned off with signs and flags, that&#8217;s done to protect snowy plover nests.</p>
<p>ODFW says beach visitors do a good job of respecting the signs, and it&#8217;s one of the reasons why the numbers of snowy plovers are rebounding.</p>
<div id="attachment_2241" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 290px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2241" title="snowy plover chick blm web" src="http://www.naturaloregon.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/snowy-plover-chick-blm-web-280x190.jpg" alt="A banded chick. Photo from Bureau of Land Management" width="280" height="190" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A banded chick. Photo from Bureau of Land Management</p></div>
<p>“This year’s data is really encouraging. It appears that the work we’ve been doing with habitat and predator management is helping,” says Dave Lauten, wildlife biologist with Oregon State University. “A lot of the thanks has to go to beach visitors who help out by observing signs and leashing their dogs to give plovers space to successfully nest and rear their young.”</p>
<p>While this year&#8217;s adult numbers are very strong, ODFW also says this past summer was hard on the chicks. 106 of them made to adulthood, a survival rate of about 33%. In 2008, only about 70 chicks survived, but that was one of the worst years on record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/11/12/endangered-shore-bird-may-be-rebounding-in-oregon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rare Seabird Remains Protected, How Will It Impact Logging?</title>
		<link>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/06/17/rare-seabird-remains-protected-how-will-it-impact-logging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/06/17/rare-seabird-remains-protected-how-will-it-impact-logging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endangered Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marbled murrelet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threatened species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. fish and wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturaloregon.org/?p=1632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of nature&#8217;s most interesting seabirds, the Marbled Murrelet will remain protected as a threatened species.  The bird was first listed in 1992 and survived an attempt by the Bush Administration to take it off the list in 2004. Today&#8217;s decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service could have a major impact on the continuing fight over old growth forests in the Pacific Northwest.  That&#8217;s because even though the bird spends much of its life in the ocean, it nests in old growth forests along the coast.  The decision says logging of the bird&#8217;s nesting habitat is the major reason its numbers have declined 34% from 2001 to 2008 in Oregon, Washington and Northern California. Environmental groups praised the decision as a victory for science over politics, and called on the Obama Administration to do more to protect old growth areas.  Kristen Boyles, an attorney for Earthjustice, says the ruling will benefit other species.  She says, &#8220;“Protecting murrelet forests also helps recover salmon and spotted owl populations, clean our air from excess carbon, and prevent pollution from entering drinking water sources for communities all up and down the coast.” Timber groups haven&#8217;t given up on trying to delist the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of nature&#8217;s most interesting seabirds, the Marbled Murrelet will remain protected as a threatened species.  The bird was first listed in 1992 and survived an attempt by the Bush Administration to take it off the list in 2004.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service could have a major impact on the continuing fight over old growth forests in the Pacific Northwest.  That&#8217;s because even though the bird spends much of its life in the ocean, it nests in old growth forests along the coast.  The decision says logging of the bird&#8217;s nesting habitat is the major reason its numbers have declined 34% from 2001 to 2008 in Oregon, Washington and Northern California.</p>
<div id="attachment_1633" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 260px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1633" title="Marbled Murrelet USFW Landscape web" src="http://www.naturaloregon.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Marbled-Murrelet-USFW-Landscape-web.jpg" alt="Courtesy U.S. Fish and Wildlife" width="250" height="167" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Courtesy U.S. Fish and Wildlife</p></div>
<p>Environmental groups praised the decision as a victory for science over politics, and called on the Obama Administration to do more to protect old growth areas.  Kristen Boyles, an attorney for Earthjustice, says the ruling will benefit other species.  She says, &#8220;“Protecting murrelet forests also helps recover salmon and spotted owl populations, clean our air from excess carbon, and prevent pollution from entering drinking water sources for communities all up and down the coast.”</p>
<p>Timber groups haven&#8217;t given up on trying to delist the Marbled Murrelet.  They&#8217;ve got a petition to delist before Fish and Wildlife.  Despite today&#8217;s announcement, the feds haven&#8217;t decided how they&#8217;ll rule on the petition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/06/17/rare-seabird-remains-protected-how-will-it-impact-logging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Really Killed The Pelicans Last Winter?</title>
		<link>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/24/what-really-killed-the-pelicans-last-winter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/24/what-really-killed-the-pelicans-last-winter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brown pelican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturaloregon.org/?p=1260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sudden die-off of West Coast Brown Pelicans last winter was big enough to make national news.  At first, wildlife officials thought a combination of climate change and bad luck was to blame.  The theory, back then, is that the Pelicans delayed migrating south from the Oregon Coast because of the gradually warming winters.  So when the nasty storm hit in December, it caught the Pelicans off guard and hundreds were killed. But an article in the Metro Santa Cruz newspaper raises questions about what really caused the die-off.  Could it be that a naturally occurring toxin called saxitoxin also played a role in the deaths?  The die-off happened when the entire Oregon Coast was closed to mussel harvesting because of elevated levels of saxitoxin.  Some of the highest levels were recorded near the mouth of the Columbia River, which is also a major roost for the Pelicans. Because the dead Pelicans weren&#8217;t tested at the time for saxitoxin, the connection is impossible to prove.  But the story is a fascinating read of detective work and science.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1261" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 260px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1261" title="brown_pelican_fws" src="http://www.naturaloregon.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/brown_pelican_fws.jpg" alt="California Brown Pelican.  Courtesy U.S. Fish and Wildlife" width="250" height="361" /><p class="wp-caption-text">California Brown Pelican.  Courtesy U.S. Fish and Wildlife</p></div>
<p>The sudden die-off of West Coast Brown Pelicans last winter was big enough to make national news.  At first, wildlife officials thought a combination of climate change and bad luck was to blame.  The theory, back then, is that the Pelicans delayed migrating south from the Oregon Coast because of the gradually warming winters.  So when the nasty storm hit in December, it caught the Pelicans off guard and hundreds were killed.</p>
<p>But an article in the <a href="http://www.metrosantacruz.com/metro-santa-cruz/04.22.09/news-0916.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.metrosantacruz.com/metro-santa-cruz/04.22.09/news-0916.html?referer=');">Metro Santa Cruz</a> newspaper raises questions about what really caused the die-off.  Could it be that a naturally occurring toxin called saxitoxin also played a role in the deaths?  The die-off happened when the entire Oregon Coast was closed to mussel harvesting because of elevated levels of saxitoxin.  Some of the highest levels were recorded near the mouth of the Columbia River, which is also a major roost for the Pelicans.</p>
<p>Because the dead Pelicans weren&#8217;t tested at the time for saxitoxin, the connection is impossible to prove.  But the story is a fascinating read of detective work and science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/24/what-really-killed-the-pelicans-last-winter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ridgefield NWR Driving Tour Reopens</title>
		<link>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/24/ridgefield-nwr-driving-tour-reopens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/24/ridgefield-nwr-driving-tour-reopens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bird watching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ridgefield national wildlife refuge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturaloregon.org/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for bird watchers! The River S Unit of Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge reopened this morning. While we’re not experts on the subject, we think this is the best birding site near Portland and have been suffering terrible withdrawals since the area was closed at the beginning of the month. The River S Unit is one of the few bird watching spots with a driving tour. Being in the car often makes it easier to see birds because the vehicle can act as a blind. Ridgefield NWR officials closed off the area at the beginning of the month for repairs on the bridge that allows access to the unit. The repair work was completed about a week ahead of schedule.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1256" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 260px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1256" title="yellowheadedblackbird2web" src="http://www.naturaloregon.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/yellowheadedblackbird2web.jpg" alt="Yellowheaded Blackbird at Ridgefield NWR" width="250" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Yellow-headed Blackbird at Ridgefield NWR</p></div>
<p>Good news for bird watchers!  The River S Unit of Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge reopened this morning.  While we’re not experts on the subject, we think this is the best birding site near Portland and have been suffering terrible withdrawals since the area was closed at the beginning of the month.</p>
<p>The River S Unit is one of the few bird watching spots with a driving tour.  Being in the car often makes it easier to see birds because the vehicle can act as a blind.</p>
<p>Ridgefield NWR officials closed off the area at the beginning of the month for repairs on the bridge that allows access to the unit.  The repair work was completed about a week ahead of schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/24/ridgefield-nwr-driving-tour-reopens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goosing The Geese Out Of Oregon</title>
		<link>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/10/goosing-the-geese-out-of-oregon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/10/goosing-the-geese-out-of-oregon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Goose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturaloregon.org/?p=1005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know something&#8217;s up when two newspapers, on the same day, run stories about the problems with Canada Geese. From the Register Guard, we learn that Eugene school officials are encouraging people to let loose their dogs on the play fields near Willagillespie Elementary School.  They&#8217;re hoping the dogs will chase and scare away a flock of Canada Geese that have been making a mess of things.  The volume of droppings is so bad that the fields have been closed during school hours all winter, although some soccer teams continue to use them.  But if the dogs don&#8217;t work, officials are looking at &#8220;other&#8221; methods. Then there&#8217;s this story from the Bend Bulletin which takes a more scholarly approach to the issue.  Wildlife officials have discovered that not all Canada Geese are bad, some are more trouble than others.  On one end of the spectrum you have geese who are just passing through, following the ancient migration route from California to Canada.  Then there&#8217;s the rude goose who won&#8217;t leave.  He&#8217;s just fine hanging out by the pond all year long, thank you very much.  He&#8217;s also the one doing most of the damage.  Officials think that by targeting the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know something&#8217;s up when two newspapers, on the same day, run stories about the problems with Canada Geese.</p>
<div id="attachment_1006" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1006" title="bad-geese" src="http://www.naturaloregon.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/bad-geese.jpg" alt="Bad Geese" width="200" height="208" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Bad Geese</p></div>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/news/cityregion/11305387-41/story.csp" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/news/cityregion/11305387-41/story.csp?referer=');">Register Guard</a>, we learn that Eugene school officials are encouraging people to let loose their dogs on the play fields near Willagillespie Elementary School.  They&#8217;re hoping the dogs will chase and scare away a flock of Canada Geese that have been making a mess of things.  The volume of droppings is so bad that the fields have been closed during school hours all winter, although some soccer teams continue to use them.  But if the dogs don&#8217;t work, officials are looking at &#8220;other&#8221; methods.</p>
<div id="attachment_1008" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1008" title="good-goose" src="http://www.naturaloregon.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/good-goose.jpg" alt="Good Goose" width="200" height="208" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Good Goose</p></div>
<p>Then there&#8217;s this story from the <a href="http://www.bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090410/NEWS0107/904100427/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090410/NEWS0107/904100427/&amp;referer=');">Bend Bulletin</a> which takes a more scholarly approach to the issue.  Wildlife officials have discovered that not all Canada Geese are bad, some are more trouble than others.  On one end of the spectrum you have geese who are just passing through, following the ancient migration route from California to Canada.  Then there&#8217;s the rude goose who won&#8217;t leave.  He&#8217;s just fine hanging out by the pond all year long, thank you very much.  He&#8217;s also the one doing most of the damage.  Officials think that by targeting the &#8220;bad&#8221; geese, the others won&#8217;t be such a problem.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope they&#8217;re right and we can all take a stroll through the park without having to worry so much about where we step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/10/goosing-the-geese-out-of-oregon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ODFW Wants Higher Fees For Hunting, Fishing, Sauvie Island</title>
		<link>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/07/odfw-wants-higher-fees-for-hunting-fishing-sauvie-island/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/07/odfw-wants-higher-fees-for-hunting-fishing-sauvie-island/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturaloregon.org/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may cost you a lot more to go fishing, shellfishing and hunting next year.  Oregon Fish and Wildlife is proposing fee increases averaging 20% starting in 2010. Some examples, the resident annual angling license fee would go from $24.75 to $32.50 and a resident annual hunter fee rises from $22.50 to $29.00. Do you like to cycle or bird watch on Sauvie Island?  The parking fees could almost double.  Daily passes would increase from $3.50 to $6.50 and annual passes would rise from $11.00 to $21.50. ODFW&#8217;s Rick Hargrave says when the fee increases were first proposed, the idea was to maintain current programs and create some new hunting and fishing opportunities.  Future fee hikes would be put off by 6-8 years. But that was before the economy tanked. Now, says Hargrave, ODFW needs to the money to protect its programs from major spending cuts and to keep them from sliding backwards.  All state agencies face possible budget cuts of 30%. The House Agriculture, Natural Resources and Rural Communities Committee is taking public testimony on the proposed increases this morning.  Standard fees for hunting and fishing haven&#8217;t been increased since 2004. ODFW is also asking for increases in several [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may cost you a lot more to go fishing, shellfishing and hunting next year.  Oregon Fish and Wildlife is proposing fee increases averaging 20% starting in 2010.</p>
<div id="attachment_917" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 285px"><img class="size-full wp-image-917" title="bonneville-fishing-odfw-web" src="http://www.naturaloregon.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/bonneville-fishing-odfw-web.jpg" alt="Courtesy ODFW" width="275" height="386" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Courtesy ODFW</p></div>
<p>Some examples, the resident annual angling license fee would go from $24.75 to $32.50 and a resident annual hunter fee rises from $22.50 to $29.00.</p>
<p>Do you like to cycle or bird watch on Sauvie Island?  The parking fees could almost double.  Daily passes would increase from $3.50 to $6.50 and annual passes would rise from $11.00 to $21.50.</p>
<p>ODFW&#8217;s Rick Hargrave says when the fee increases were first proposed, the idea was to maintain current programs and create some new hunting and fishing opportunities.  Future fee hikes would be put off by 6-8 years.</p>
<p>But that was before the economy tanked.</p>
<p>Now, says Hargrave, ODFW needs to the money to protect its programs from major spending cuts and to keep them from sliding backwards.  All state agencies face possible budget cuts of 30%.</p>
<p>The House Agriculture, Natural Resources and Rural Communities Committee is taking public testimony on the proposed increases this morning.  Standard fees for hunting and fishing haven&#8217;t been increased since 2004.</p>
<p>ODFW is also asking for increases in several commercial fishing fees.</p>
<p>For more information see ODFW&#8217;s website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dfw.state.or.us/agency/budget/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dfw.state.or.us/agency/budget/?referer=');"><em>ODFW 2009-2011 Budget Includes Proposed Fee Increase</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/07/odfw-wants-higher-fees-for-hunting-fishing-sauvie-island/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change Is Coming To Ridgefield Wildlife Refuge</title>
		<link>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/02/change-is-coming-to-ridgefield-wildlife-refuge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/02/change-is-coming-to-ridgefield-wildlife-refuge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturaloregon.org/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s probably the best bird watching spot that&#8217;s also close to the Portland-Vancouver metro area. But like it or not, change is coming to Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge. According to the Columbian, refuge managers have come up with four alternatives for their new 15-year management plan. The preferred alternative calls for closing some of the hunting areas near the refuge&#8217;s popular auto tour in the River S unit. In exchange, hunters would be allowed on nearby Bachelor Island which is currently off limits to the public. Wildlife watchers would benefit from a new hiking trail. Comments are being taken until April 10th. Meanwhile, the refuge is looking at plans to find a new location for a bridge into the auto tour. The current one has safety issues. Sadly, the auto tour has been closed for the month of April, right in the middle of the prime bird watching season, so the old wooden bridge can be upgraded.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably the best bird watching spot that&#8217;s also close to the Portland-Vancouver metro area.  But like it or not, change is coming to Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge.</p>
<div id="attachment_837" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-837" title="ridgefield-nwr-web" src="http://www.naturaloregon.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ridgefield-nwr-web.jpg" alt="Along the auto tour in the River S unit at Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge." width="300" height="200" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Along the auto tour in the River S unit at Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge.</p></div>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.columbian.com/article/20090402/SPORTS04/704029954" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.columbian.com/article/20090402/SPORTS04/704029954?referer=');">Columbian</a>, refuge managers have come up with four alternatives for their new 15-year management plan.  The preferred alternative calls for closing some of the hunting areas near the refuge&#8217;s popular auto tour in the River S unit.  In exchange, hunters would be allowed on nearby Bachelor Island which is currently off limits to the public.  Wildlife watchers would benefit from a new hiking trail.  Comments are being taken until April 10th.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the refuge is looking at plans to find a new location for a bridge into the auto tour.  The current one has safety issues.  Sadly, the auto tour has been closed for the month of April, right in the middle of the prime bird watching season, so the old wooden bridge can be upgraded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/02/change-is-coming-to-ridgefield-wildlife-refuge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sauvie Island Closure Extended For Two Weeks</title>
		<link>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/01/sauvie-island-closure-extended-for-two-weeks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/01/sauvie-island-closure-extended-for-two-weeks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturaloregon.org/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ODFW is keeping some of its areas on Sauvie Island closed to the public for an extra two weeks.  The opening of the Eastside units will be delayed until May 1st, while Westside, Oak Island and North units will open as normal on April 16. The Department says the reason for the extended closure is that wintering Cackling Geese are staying longer than expected.  If the areas were opened too soon to people, the disruption might cause the geese to move into neighboring farm lands where they could seriously damage crops. Cackling Geese look like smaller versions of the Canada Goose and were once considered a sub-species.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ODFW is keeping some of its areas on Sauvie Island closed to the public for an extra two weeks.  The opening of the Eastside units will be delayed until May 1st, while Westside, Oak Island and North units will open as normal on April 16.</p>
<p>The Department says the reason for the extended closure is that wintering Cackling Geese are staying longer than expected.  If the areas were opened too soon to people, the disruption might cause the geese to move into neighboring farm lands where they could seriously damage crops.</p>
<p>Cackling Geese look like smaller versions of the Canada Goose and were once considered a sub-species.</p>
<div id="attachment_798" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-798" title="Cackler geese" src="http://www.naturaloregon.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/cackling-geese-sauvie-island-odfw-web.jpg" alt="A flock of Cackling Geese on Sauvie Island.  Courtesy ODFW." width="500" height="202" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A flock of Cackling Geese on Sauvie Island.  Courtesy ODFW.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturaloregon.org/2009/04/01/sauvie-island-closure-extended-for-two-weeks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

