Utilities

A Lump Of Coal For PGE, Protest Day In Portland

August 16, 2010
By

Give the gang at Coal Free Oregon some credit for coming up with new ways to keep their cause in the news.

Read more »

Game Changer: DEQ Takes A Fresh Look At Shutting Down Boardman

June 28, 2010
By

PGE's coal fired Boardman Power Plant. Photo from Ted Timmons

The news must have landed at PGE like a ton of coal.

Oregon DEQ says its looking at three options for an early closure of PGE’s coal-fired power plant at Boardman. They call on the utility to spend millions more to keep the plant running, or shutting it down a lot earlier than PGE wants.

Read more »

DEQ: Let’s Take Another Look At An Early Shut Down Of Boardman

May 18, 2010
By

PGE's coal-fired power plant near Boardman, OR. Photo from Brian Pasko.

The campaign to shut down Oregon’s only coal-fired power plant by 2014 just got some big news.

The Department of Environmental Quality says it will recommend that the state reject PGE’s proposal to close the Boardman power plant by 2020, and take some additional time to study alternatives for an early shut down.

Read more »

Clean Up Or Shut Down: New Pressure On The Boardman Coal Plant

May 4, 2010
By

PGE's coal fired Boardman Power Plant. Photo from Ted Timmons

Environmental groups hope they’ve found another way to force an early closure of Oregon’s only coal fired power plant, the PGE facility near Boardman.

The idea is to make PGE to spend so much money on pollution controls, the utility will decide that shutting down Boardman will be cheaper than cleaning it up.

Read more »

Oregon Scores High In Renewable Energy Rankings

May 3, 2010
By

There aren’t many places where renewable energy is as popular as it is here in Oregon.

Read more »

VIDEO: Ready For Copenhagen, Thanks To The States

December 3, 2009
By

Copenhagen Logo webWhile Congress dithers on climate change legislation, a new report says we’re actually in pretty good shape for the upcoming global warming talks in Copenhagen. The reason? The report says several states are showing strong leadership on global warming and that’s giving the U.S. a head start on reducing carbon emissions.

Although the report is national in scope, it was released locally by Environment Oregon.

Here are some of the major findings:

Capping Carbon: Six states, including California, have set caps on carbon pollution. There’s also a regional cap-and-trade program for power plant emissions in the Northeast. These efforts will cut carbon emissions by 270 million metric tons annually by 2020. Oregon tried to create a cap-and-trade system during the last legislative session, but business groups and utilities were able to kill it.

Clean Energy: 29 states, including Oregon, now require that a certain percentage of power in the state come from renewable sources. In Oregon, we’re aiming for a 25% renewable energy standard by 2025. Meanwhile, 22 states are taking concrete steps to improve energy efficiency in homes and buildings. Others, including Oregon, are looking at new rules on low-carbon fuel for cars and trucks.

States Are Leading By Example: California’s clean cars program has been adopted by 14 states, including Oregon and Washington. There’s an effort underway to make it a national program. That would mean 31 million fewer tons of carbon emissions every year, by 2020. States have also led the way on efficiency standards for appliances and lighting. The federal government is considering national standards.

More on this after the video…

The result of all these initiatives is that the United States is already on track for removing 536 million tons of carbon every year by 2020.

Meanwhile, check out the new “We’re Ready” video produced by Environment America.

If At First You Don’t Succeed… New Routes For Eastern Oregon Power Line

November 12, 2009
By

With possibly two new high voltage power lines coming to NW Oregon and SW Washington, here’s a reminder that we’re not the only ones dealing with these issues.

For more than a year, Idaho Power has been trying to find a route for a 500 kilovolt transmission line from Boardman, Ore. to Hemingway, Idaho. That’s about 300 miles long, cutting through forests, farm land and range.

The first proposed routes were so badly received that Idaho Power dropped them and started all over from scratch.

So what are they looking at now? The latest map, courtesy the Stop Idaho Power blog, resembles a giant multicolored spider’s web covering most of Eastern Oregon. While the first routes were roughly parallel to I-84, this newest map includes routes that could run north into Washington, or as far south as Burns.

Another New Power Line? PGE Meeting Tomorrow In Portland

November 11, 2009
By

A reminder from the Oregonian that PGE is holding a open house tomorrow about a proposal to build a new 500 kilovolt power line from Boardman to Salem. Actually, they’ve been holding these open houses for the past couple of weeks, but this one is in Portland.

Power lines are always controversial because of the impact to homes and business. But this one, called Cascade Crossing, is planned to go through large sections of the Mt. Hood National Forest.

That’s what has the environmental group Bark so concerned. It’s worried about another adding 500 foot wide path of clear cut through the forest. And the while the power line helps bring renewable energy from wind farms into the Willamette Valley, it will also be linked to PGE’s coal powered plant near Boardman. Read more about Bark’s concerns here.

Details on Thursday’s Open House

Hilton Hotel
Broadway Room
921 SW Sixth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204

VIDEO: Can Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Stop An LNG Pipeline?

November 9, 2009
By

Meet Steve Wick. He’s a Yamhill County hazelnut farmer who’s so old-school he still calls them filberts. He’s an anti-LNG activist, self described “big mouth”, and if all goes according to plan, a soon to be viral video sensation

Wick stars in a new YouTube video (see below) that’s trying to get people’s attention about the Palomar Pipeline, a 220-mile natural gas pipeline that runs through the heart of Oregon’s wine country, Willamette Valley farm land, and the Mt. Hood National Forest. “Oregon’s bread basket,” as Wick likes to call it.

For Wick, it’s a personal battle. The proposed route runs through the middle of his small farm, cutting a 150-foot wide path in a field where he wants to plant grapes and across 20 acres of forest that he and his wife have nurtured since moving here in 1992. If the pipeline goes in, Wick won’t be able to plant those grapes or replace the trees that would be cut down. Just the idea that a pipeline might come in means there’s not much he can do with his property until the issue is settled. “I’m up in limbo here,” he says.

Wick isn’t alone. He tells of one neighbor whose organic farm will be destroyed by the Palomar Pipeline. Others he knows will lose chunks of their hazelnut orchards.

And one more thing. “A lot of people don’t know about this,” says Wick. One of the partners in this project is NW Natural Gas, the home-grown, Portland based company that’s been around since before Oregon was a state. In Wick’s view, “They’re doing this to Oregon and there’s no need for it.”

It’s that last point that has become the central message for Wick and others working to block the pipeline. They formed a campaign called Hey! NW Natural that’s using social media tools like Facebook and Twitter to get NW Natural customers and shareholders involved in the fight against Palomar. Well known environmental groups like the Oregon Sierra Club, Columbia Riverkeeper, Bark and Friends of Living Oregon Waters are helping to spread the word.

Monica Vaughan is one of the organizers of the social media effort, which kicked off less than a week ago. “We’re asking NW Natural customers,” she says, “to think about where your gas is coming from.” Like Wick, she says most people in the Portland area aren’t aware that the utility is developing the pipeline. She hopes the video and website will help farmers tell their stories, and convince customers to take action to block Palomar. Future plans include handing out anti-LNG inserts that can be mailed in with utility bills and anti-LNG stickers to slap on natural gas meters.

Her goal, get NW Natural to drop Palomar before its next stockholder meeting in May of 2010.

Ask Wick what’s so bad about Palomar and he can list a number of things. Like others in the anti-LNG movement he says none of the natural gas that will flow through Palomar will serve people in Oregon, even though our state will feel all the impact. The Palomar website is vague on the point, saying it will deliver gas to Oregon and “other western states”. For many anti-LNG’ers, that means its really going to California.

Palomar is also controversial because it ties in to the proposed Bradwood Landing LNG Plant on the Columbia River near Astoria. Opponents are concerned that Bradwood poses a risk to salmon habitat, to fishing and shipping on the river, and is a danger to public safety. Without Palomar, Bradwood isn’t connected to interstate pipelines. So anti-LNG opponents hope that by killing one project, they can kill both of them.

Meanwhile, here’s the video featuring Steve Wick.

Enviro Groups Score 3 Wins, 1 Loss Today At The Legislature

June 29, 2009
By

Three more pieces of the environmental agenda received final passage today and are on their way to Governor Kulongoski.  Not a bad day considering the four victories racked up over the weekend.  Meanwhile, enviros took a big loss on a renewable energy bill.

So as we used to say in televsion, let’s go right to the highlights.

Field Burning Ban

Those late summer smoky skies over the Willamette Valley should pretty much disapear over the next few years thanks to Senate Bill 528.  The bill, passed today by the House, phases out most field burning by 2013.  Now it goes to Governor K.  The bill exempts about 15,000 acres of hilly terrain.

According to the Department of Environmental Quality, current law allows for about 65,000 acres of field burning, but over the past few years the actual number of acres burned is closer to 50,000.  But in the mid 1980s, as many as 250,000 acres were burned each year.

Invasive Species

The final passage of House Bill 2020 means state officials will be able to move faster against outbreaks of invasive species.  The bill sets aside $350,000 that can be tapped for such things as rapid response to outbreaks, inspections and eradication of invaders.  Today’s approval by the Senate puts this bill into the hands of the Governor.

Coal Burning Power Plants

Senate Bill 101 makes it harder for electric utilities to get power from coal burning power plants.  It says the coal burning plants have to meet certain standards for greenhouse gas emissions before utilities can enter into long term contracts for their power.  In addition, it says Oregon utilities can’t sign long term contracts with any kind of power plant, unless the plant’s emissions are as clean as ones that run on natural gas.  This bill goes to the Governor after getting final passage by the House.

Renewable Energy

This is one area where the environmental agenda has taken some hits, including today’s final passage of House Bill 2940.  The bill means utilities won’t have to work so hard to meet Oregon’s Renewable Energy Standard.  By law, utilities have to get 25% of their power from renewable sources by the year 2025.

Originally, the law said anything built before 1995 didn’t count towards meeting that standard.  But HB 2940 creates an exception for nine older biomass plants that were built before the 1995 deadline.  By letting utilities include them as renewable sources, enviros say it makes it too easy to meet the Renewable Energy Standards.

The renewable standard has been credited with helping create the boom in renewable energy projects around the state, especially wind and solar.  So if this bill becomes law, the fear is that it will slow the growth of renewable energy and the slow the growth of green jobs in the state.

The Oregon League of Conservation Voters is hoping Governor Kulongoski will veto the bill.  One of his spokesman told the Oregonian last week it would be hard for him to support it.

Thanks to Evan Manvel of the Oregon League of Conservation Voters for today’s updates.