Fishing

Mixed Reviews on Klamath Dam Deal

November 16, 2008
By

The news this week about the Klamath River dams is so huge, it’s almost impossible to believe how far we’ve come in the past seven years.

The headline is this. Pacific Power, which owns the four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River, has agreed to their removal. It’s an agreement in principle. There are many obstacles to overcome. It’ll take years to implement. But if this goes through one of the great salmon rivers of the west coast could be running free from headwaters to the ocean.

This is THE Klamath we’re talking about. Low salmon numbers from this river led to a near closure of the commercial salmon season across most of Oregon and Northern California in 2006. Bitter water wars erupted in 2001 when farmers were denied irrigation water in favor of salmon and other fish. The farmers got their water after the Bush administration intervened, and the following year tens of thousands of salmon died in warm, shallow waters.

So why would any salmon respecting green group be opposed to such a deal?

For Oregon Wild, this deal amounts to little more than a last minute attempt by the Bush team to reward its friends. Oregon Wild says the deal relies on getting $1 billion from the federal government, a four year cost-benefit analysis by the Interior Department, and other conditions it describes as “highly unlikely” to be met. Meanwhile, work on removing the dams wouldn’t even begin until 2020.

Oregon Wild also complains that the deal gives too much water to agribusiness, doesn’t preserve enough water for salmon, and grants another 50-year extension of agriculture development on the Lower Klamath and Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuges.

Other environmental groups are not so cynical. The Wild Salmon Center in Portland told the Oregonian that this is as big as anything they’ve seen to restore a river. The group’s President, Guido Rahr, is quoted as saying “You really are giving a river the chance to come back.”

Sustainable Northwest called the agreement a step in the right direction. This group was involved in the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, which is based on seeing the dams removed. Sustainable Northwest called on the federal and state governments to implement the entire Klamath Basin agreement and to remove the dams quickly enough so that salmon will benefit.

12 years is a long time to wait for dam removal to begin. Much of the costs of dam removal will fall on the shoulders of Oregon customers of Pacific Power. A deal that removes dams, but still doesn’t provide the water needed by salmon isn’t much of a deal at all.

Powerful political forces are lining up behind this. We hope they get it right.

New Groundfish Rules Approved

November 8, 2008
By

No surprise as the Feds approve a new management plan for groundfish on the West Coast. But, fishermen were able to change the rules in a way that allows them to keep more of the catch.

What the Pacific Fishery Management Council did was to create a quota system for individual boats, rather that one big quota covering everyone. The current system creates a big “race for the finish line” as fisherman rush to the ocean to catch as much as they can before the quota runs out. The new system allows them to fish at their own pace, waiting for better weather, better fishing conditions, or even a better price in the marketplace.

The changes had widespread support, except for one rule that guaranteed 20% of the harvest to processing companies. Fishermen complained that it gave processors too much control over prices. Processors said they needed the guaranteed supply to protect their investments in their businesses.

What the Council did was to split the difference. Processors will still get 20% of the whiting catch. Fisherman get to keep everything else.

New Fishing Rules Due Next Week

October 31, 2008
By

Big changes are coming to the west coast fishing industry.

Next week, the Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) is expect to approve a new quota system for groundfish. Supporters say it will lead to a dramatic rebound in the ocean, reduce the waste of unwanted fish, and generally make the harvest more sustainable.

So what’s all the fuss about?

Some basics; we’re talking groundfish here. This includes species such as sole, cod and rockfish (better known as red snapper). This doesn’t include salmon, which has dominated the headlines for the past couple of years.

Next, a look at the current rules. The feds set an overall quota for the season. Each boat is allowed to catch as much as it can until the quota is filled. It’s not quite that simple, of course, but you get the picture.

Under the new rules, each boat gets an individual quota. Once that quota is filled, the boat is done for the season even if other boats are not. Plus, the owner can sell or trade his quota with other fishermen.

The rules are based on a system used in British Columbia which has seen a big turnaround in fishing stocks since it went into effect in 1997.

The big sticking point? The proposed rules set aside 20% of the quotas for processors. Processors argue they need a guaranteed supply to protect the investment they made in their plants and equipment. Others, including the Environmental Defense Fund say that gives processors too much control over prices.

The meetings start this weekend and run until Friday.

For more information visit:
Pacific Fishery Management Council: November 2208 Briefing Book